SPARK PLUGS; spark plug threaded holes; Torques;ANTISEIZE OR NOT, spark plug caps; resistor & non-resistor spark plugs
sparkplugs.htm-32
©
Aluminum cylinder heads can be damaged
relatively easily if one is not careful. There is a
distinct limit to the abuse caused by over-tightening a spark
plug, or removing and replacing a spark plug when the cylinder
head threads are full of hard carbon, ETC..
The early BMW airheads...let me just call them the /2 bikes, had
some metals and casting problems and very careful torquing, with
the best antiseize compounds of the day, still brought occasional
problems. I've seen poor metals and poor castings bring about
failure of the factory installed 'cast-in-place' steel threads
inserts, and heat-cool cycling on those early inserts caused
problems.
For our /5 and later airheads,
the metal in the heads, and the castings, are considerably
better. There are always problems, and these problems
occur in several ways. Folks simply refuse to use torque
wrenches, and some who do or do not, still over-torque the spark
plugs. I have seen someone over-torque a spark plug and he
WAS using a torque wrench, and it WAS set properly. His
problem was not realizing that many clicker torque wrenches tend
to be hard to detect the click, if the setting is fairly low on
the wrench. SOME 75 or 80 or 100 footpound wrenches might have a
rather subtle click when set much lower, say around 12
footpounds. Some torque wrench 'clicks' are kind of
subtle at lower settings;....I have seen such a wrench, a 0-75 ft
lb range one, that had such a subtle click, that someone pulled a
cylinder stud...at a setting of 26 ftlbs. They did this right in
front of me at a TechDay. Know your wrench. If you
don't know what the click feels like at various settings, and are
not all that familiar with torque wrenches, put the wrench
working square end into your bench vise and test the feel
required for some torque settings, ... feel and listen for that
click. NOTE that cheap beam-type torque wrenches (not the
dial indicator commercial types) may be very INaccurate....and
should not be used for critical items.
Abused, eventually the cylinder head threads start distorting and
pulling out. While Helicoil installation, or welding, or other
inserts, all do work OK, I am NOT a great fan of doing it, and it
is usually avoidable if one takes some extra care in the first
place. I don't like to see extra places for sharp bits of
carbon to adhere to and create hot spots in the cylinder heads,
possible with these inserts. Sharp spots can create places
for improper combustion...PRE-IGNITION it is called..
I have installed Helicoils, and also have actually welded up the
areas and drilled and re-tapped them, of course the heads have to
come off for sure....best to remove the head in any fix
anyway....although one CAN use the official Helicoil Spark Plug
Thread repair kit, and with well-greased parts, and with the
valves both open at the overlap period (so you can blow any
possible chips out with an air hose)....you CAN do a good job
withOUT removing the head.
The use of antiseize is somewhat
controversial, mostly I think this is due to SOME spark
plug manufacturer's literature.
Reasons to NOT use antiseize compounds:
(1) Some experienced mechanics feel that it is then easy to overtorque and pull threads. My answer is that is that you should be using a torque wrench, AND lowering the official torque (which is usually for use withOUT antiseize compound).
(2) Since popular antiseize compounds act like a lubricant, the applied torque MUST be reduced...about a 1/3 reduction is roughly correct. SOME manufacturer's are concerned with SOME types of spark plugs, such as taper seat types, and ....so they make a blanket statement not to use antiseize compounds. Other manufacturers say OK, and give the needed lower torque values. Some manufacturer's SAY they are concerned with with HEAT conduction....probably thinking that the heat range of the spark plug is changed by the use of antiseize compound. I have NOT seen this in real life situations. I have always used some sort of antiseize compound on my own spark plugs...and I have close to 540,000 miles on airheads. I've NEVER 'pulled' spark plug threads out of my cylinder heads.
Antiseize compounds vary in characteristics, but I have found
that all are OK at the spark plugs. ONE thing you do NOT want to
do is use OIL!!!...and that includes WD40.....those will
carbonize, and cause thread damage over a long period of
time. Using oil or WD40 will tend to
eventually result in hard carbon deposits in the threads, and
thus tend to wear the threads, and tend to change the effective
torque.
NOTE: ONCE
antiseize is used, it tends to work its way into the aluminum
head metal....from that point on, it is best to use
antiseize.
Some spark plugs seem to have a bit less diameter on the threads,
and that promotes carbon and wear. That, and other
thread and quality control problems have been reported on
Champion and other spark plugs. Bosch tolerances seem
to be better, and Bosch plates the threads, which helps avoid use
of antiseize, if you are so
inclined. NGK spark plugs are known
to be of good quality.
Spark plugs that, upon a wee bit of loosening, seem to then tighten up, should be oiled...a penetrating oil (or Kerosene!)...allowed to soak, even overnight if need be; and possibly carefully tightened a bit first, if that is not overtorquing, and then removed carefully to avoid damaging the threads. I have had to clean up carbone'd threads MANY times...a good fresh sharp 14 mm tap works wonders, and I use a bit of White Lead on the tap during the thread reforming. Yes, in many an instance the tap will reform the threads, rather than cut them (it may do both), on the soft aluminum. I then thoroughly clean the threads, leaving the threads clean and dry. THEN I antiseize...a dab...not much, on the spark plug threads, when installing the new spark plug; and torquing properly (proper torque is LESS than the books say for untreated spark plugs, when using antiseize!!). You do NOT have to spread a lot of antiseize onto a plug threads. You want to totally avoid getting any on the ceramic tip area, where it might electrically short circuit the plug. A wee dab, droplet, on a fingertip, spread into maybe the first 4 threads at the tip end, is just fine. If you are going to use a tap to clean the threads in the cylinder head, I recommend you first insert some cloth (or??), rolled up to spark plug thread diameter, soaked in kerosene or other very slow evaporating petroleum solvent, and insert into the threads. Let it sit overnight, before you use the lubricated tap. This may well help soften the carbon and reduce wear on the threads.
It is VERY important to have a guide machined to allow the tap to start the threads dead square to the surface...unless you are quite careful about it. If using a long tap, don't have the piston at top dead center!
***The
exact amount of torque to use:
You CAN tighten spark plugs by hand, no torque
wrench, once you have a good feel for it, but use of the torque
wrench is HIGHLY recommended. I've seen various
forces needed to properly seat the crush rings. I suspect
crush rings vary somewhat. Since we all know that many of
you are cheapskates and will not use fresh crush rings, the
values I am giving here are generally safe
values, with a drop of
antiseize spread onto the spark plug threads:
3/4" reach, 14 mm, about 12 ftlbs.
This is the stock top spark plug size. Avoid going over 13
ftlbs.
1/2" reach, 14 mm, about 9 ft lbs; this
is the commonly used bottom spark plug size on dual-plug
conversions;....which is USUALLY just enough to seat the washer
and a tad more. I'd prefer less on the 1/2 reach, say about 7 or
8, but this may well not be enough to
ensure a positive seating. In fact, it may barely be
enough on a already used crush washer. You can try.
Be careful. JUST snug is right. You don't want the
plug too loose either...if it loosens and rattles out, that
pulls/wears threads. I've been able to use 10 ft lbs
sometimes.
Some have installed smaller spark plugs for the lower
plugs. I've had good results with that same 7 or 8 ftlbs.
Some have installed a welded thick washer at the lower spark
plug, that allows the top and bottom spark plugs to both be
3/4" reach. If you have this style of lower spark plug
threaded area, then the recommendation of 12, 13 max, as for the
top plug, is correct.
NOTE: with no antiseize 'ever' used on your heads, you
can torque to 16 footpounds on the TOP plugs; and if you have the
1/2" reach 14 mm bottom plugs, you can go towards 12-14.
One is supposed to, in most old literature,
use a new crush washer each time a plug is removed and replaced,
but we all know that most of you won't, and many plugs have the
washers fairly well captive, and finding new crush washers is
often frustrating. Be careful about the torque.
For those who are curious, some manuals had recommendations on
10 mm plugs of 8-12 ftlbs in aluminum, and 12 mm plugs 10-18
ftlbs in aluminum. Champion used such values in their
books...and I WELL remember that the 14 mm plugs used on the
Mazda rotary engines had a special recommendation of 8-13 ftlbs.
New gaskets, every time, was recommended. I
suggest you use the values I have suggested, not these.
Airheads with dual-plug conversions will likely have 12 mm or 14
mm 1/2" reach lower spark plugs. It is especially important
to NOT overtorque those lower plugs.
FYI, if you INSIST on NO
antiseize:
14 mm, 1/2", 12-14 ftlbs, DRY, limits.
14 mm, 3/4", 16-18 ftlbs, DRY, limits.
12 mm, 1/2", 10-12 ftlbs, DRY, limits.
OFFICIAL BMW Service Information sheet on the late airheads: 18.4
ftlbs (3/4 reach). You
will not find ME using that overly high value, dry threads or
not!!
MORE information:
I will use the Bosch manual information here as an example:
For removal.......you are supposed to
loosen the spark plug a little bit, and if then becomes tight,
use some thin oil or kerosene on the partially exposed thread,
screw in, and then out after a few minutes. I say overnight if a
problem. Bosch's instructions for installation were:
"'use a torque wrench....or, if not available...hand
tighten....until seated....then an additional 90°...avoid over
or under tightening'". Bosch does not point out, I
will, that this is for a brand new plug and NEW, obviously never
crushed before, gasket. ((I heartily recommend you watch out for
overtightening, using that 90° method withOUT a NEW FRESH crush
washer is VERY hazardous to your heads)). I am hesitant to
tell you flatly to use Bosche's recommendation to use 90° on a
NEW crush washer...it may well be too much.
Previous recommendations in SOME spark plug manufacturer's books
has been as high as 16-18 footpounds for torque. That is
NOT a good idea, in MY opinion, for Airheads.
*****The latest
Bosch manuals, for 14 mm spark plugs in BOTH aluminum and cast
iron heads, recommend 7-15 ft lbs. That is NOT oiled or
antiseized!!! Unfortunately, no further
information about the thread length, is given.
MY opinion is that 15 is safe on the 3/4 reach plugs....NOT
antiseize coated.
Some manufacturer's recommend penetrating oil for tight plugs
during removal. Most fail to tell you to REMOVE that
oil before installing a new plug.
Some years ago it was common was to see 14 mm
spark plugs specified in plug manuals at 26-30 ftlbs (!!!)
in cast iron; 18-22 ftlbs in aluminum. NO allowance for short or
longer thread types was usually shown. Do
NOT use such values!!!
Spark
plug threaded holes:
It is not uncommon to see damaged spark plug threaded holes in
the cylinder heads. This comes from excessive torque,
dirty carboned threads, etc. If the threads are
in need of repair, you may....or may not....be able to 'reform'
them, withOUT installing a Helicoil. Some
experience and an inspection with #1 eyeball, should tell you yes
or no. NOTE that
if one EVER uses antiseize at a spark plug, that material can
impregnate the threads, and unless a Helicoil is being installed,
it is best to continue with anti-seize, and to REDUCE maximum
torque.
The best repair for severely damaged spark
plug holes is to remove the head, install a Helicoil.
Since many folks want a quicker way, here are some methods of
repairing, that may work for you withOUT removing the head:
Using a sharp
tap, and very slowly and carefully, rethread the hole, backing
out the tap often. This may re-form the threads into some
sort of usable condition. To prevent any chips from
getting into the cylinder, there are various ways. These
INclude using a lot of grease on the tap; filling the cylinder
with shaving cream (must be cleaned out later); using a vacuum
cleaner in reverse, to pressurize the cylinder from the end of
the exhaust pipe. Or, a combination of things. If you
intend to use the pressure method, before starting the process of
tapping, be sure the exhaust valve on that cylinder is opened and
intake closed. If you are installing a Helicoil with
the head still on the cylinder, you may want to use the
grease-on-tap method, and the pressure method, both at the same
time. NOTE that it is critical that the threads be 100%
DEgreased before installing the Helicoil, and the Helicoil may be
locked in place by using Loctite RED during its installation (do
NOT forget to have the Helicoil below the surface!).
Allow the RED Loctite to FULLY cure for a couple of days, then
clean the threads VERY thoroughly with a strong solvent, such as
acetone or MEK.....BEFORE
ever installing a spark plug!!!
NOTE: It is best, for all these procedure
types being done withOUT head removal, to have the piston down
from TDC (down from OT mark) enough so that drills, taps, etc.,
will not strike the piston. Do not go too far with this, or
there will be lots more volume which takes too much shaving cream
foam, or too much air movement to blow out the chips.
NOTE!....If using the pressure
method, be SURE to wear eye protection...chips WILL be
flying out the spark plug hole.
to which I replied:
There are reasons I do not recommend resistance plugs
from ANY manufacturer. 'Resistor' plugs were
originally made so as to reduce the current in the spark and
leads, and thereby reduce Radio Frequency Interference (RFI).
It is possible that a reason might have been
spark duration time too....as the proper resistance will
increase the length of time the spark lasts, allowing better
igniting of the fuel-air mixture.
Some types of RFI interfere with other things, such as
electronic ignitions, and electronic tachometers, sometimes in
strange ways. In our airheads, the resistance in the
plug caps have SEVERAL functions...here are a few...more
following this paragraph. (1) reduce the erosion of the
electrodes in the spark plugs. (2) RFI.
(3) protect against RFI being conducted into wiring and thereby
getting to the Hall element in the canister on 1981+ models....it
can destroy the part.
You will find the same cautions for various
reasons in such as the Boyer Microdigital ignition, etc.
If
one uses resistor plugs and non-resistor caps, there is a danger
that you might install non-resistor plugs later on, and injure
your electronic ignition.
More:
1. The proper resistance in the circuit will ensure the
proper ENERGY level AND the LENGTH OF TIME the spark lasts.
The coil(s) and engine were designed with THAT in mind, amongst
other things. If the spark lasts too short a period
of time, the ignition will not be as good. Same for too low
energy, which can be reduced by excessive
resistance. The length of time the spark lasts
is called Duration.
2. On the POINTS airheads,
especially the points models with two coils before 1979, the
stock caps were about 1000 ohms in the earliest years, then went
to 5000 ohms. A change on these ...and these only!
points models from 5000 back to 1000 ohms MIGHT give some
extra ignition performance, in the highest rpm area...near
redline+-.....and probably in starting in cold
weather. The 1981+ models have more energy coming
from the coil(s), and can handle the 5000 ohm caps...and anything
under 2500 is likely to damage the ignition on 1981+
models.
3. SOME 'resistor' spark plugs are not
true resistor plugs...they have a small coil of nearly
resistance-free wire, wound to act like an electronic
'choke'...or, inductance device. The electronic
ignition may NOT like it, and I can theorize some
problems. That same sort of thing was done with
spiral-wrapped ignition wire....sold as Suppression Wire, where
it was NOT really resistance suppression wire.
Bosch
has been dropping the availability of NON-resistor spark
plugs. I expect, per what Bosch technical support folks
have told me, that in the NEAR future you will not be able to
purchase Bosch spark plugs withOUT resistors.....although MAYBE
BMW dealers can supply them...MAYBE. Bosch has told
me that the nominal value for the resistors in their plugs is
going to be 2000 to 6000 ohms. At this time I can NOT
recommend, and in fact specifically caution against, using Bosch
"resistor" plugs. This is especially so in 1981+
models, or any models you have converted to electronic
ignition. This does not include those points models with
just a points booster amplifier; although I do NOT like to see
resistor plugs at all in airheads. You COULD use
resistor plugs from Bosch if you removed the resistor spark plug
caps and installed zero ohm caps (on POINTS models); but I
especially do NOT recommend this for 1981+ electronic ignition
models or any with other types of electronic ignition...for the
reasons stated.
Special spark plug electrode styles:
NON-projected nose platinum (or non-platinum or other
metals) spark plugs MAY foul, misfire, and their gap arrangement
is not the best for ANY airhead. Later style projected-nose
platinum plugs with more than one surrounding ground electrodes
are a waste of money and may well NOT give reliable
ignition...they can, at a minimum, occasionally misfire.
Single ground electrode, projected nose, platinum plugs are OK,
but a WASTE of money, and there is some indication that the 'fine
electrode' platinum plugs are NOT as good as the STOCK Bosch W
series. Of course, this is contrary to manufacturer's
advertising....nothing new about that sort of thing.
Save your money, DO NOT buy specialty spark plugs, not even those
from Bosch.... but DO purchase Bosch or NGK standard spark plugs;
NON resistor types. Avoid Champion spark plugs, I don't like
the threads.
For 14 mm 3/4" length spark plug threads, probably
Bosch type W5DC to W8DC for the top and th e1/2" length
types W5BC to W8BC for the bottom (unless you have the welded
washer modification, allowing the DC for bottom
plugs). If you have smaller lower plugs, then use the
proper ones. The heat range will depend on your bike
CR, carburetion, and many other factors. Use stock gaps, about
.024" to .028". Be
careful, some Bosch plugs have different gaps than needed for our
Airheads...esp. the WR line.
Do NOT use resistor plugs....if
the part number has an R in it, it is likely a resistor plug.
Some plug makers, including Bosch in its new numbering system
(which I dislike, they offer no information by number as to head
range nor size).... do not use that R, simply using an all
numbers no letters part number, so BEWARE! If you INSIST on
using resistor plugs because you are too lazy to wait for an
order for the non-resistor types, and use the stock resistor
caps, your ignition MIGHT be a bit weak, but I don't see any
problems beyond, MAYBE, hard starting and occasional
misfiring...depending a whole bunch on engine and electricals
condition.
see EXPANDED, just below:
EXPANDED :
This is an expansion on what is above.
This is edited from something I posted to the K-bmw list.
Where precious metal (iridium, platinum...) spark plugs shine is on vehicles
that don't have the spark plugs replaced very often. Years and years ago
that meant industrial pumping engines and so on. More recently,
especially in the later nineties and to the present, many cars are not having
the manufacturer's recommend plug changes until 80K...or even 100K miles.
Many modern cars are running somewhat higher rpm, more sparks per mile, and
using very high powered ignition systems....that is even harder on spark plug
electrodes.
In the old days, spark plugs HAD to be replaced around...roughly...15,000 miles
due to lead fouling. Leaded fuels are now long gone; and, the present
additives do NOT electrically foul the spark plugs (or, are vastly less inclined
to do so). Engines are also running leaner, which means more heat, and the
spark plugs are being specified to run slightly hotter to keep deposits
reasonable....all these things eat metal a tad faster. Because modern
engines are fuel-injected and burn very close to optimum at nearly all times;
the need for very high powered ignition systems is greatly increased. Most
cars have high performance ignition systems.....many have separate coils for
each cylinder and/or fast rise times on the spark, and lots of Joule's.
These systems can kill. It is true that many cars, if not most, have
series resistances in the ignition leads...but that only cuts down the current
somewhat; not, generally, the total energy;....but it also makes the spark last
longer....duration is the word....as well as JOULE's of energy delivered.
High powered ignitions eat electrodes. There are some cars that have a
polarity reversing method in their ignition systems....every other spark is
reversed in polarity...this helps a small amount with erosion, but not so good
with ignition performance...unless the energy is increased...which is
done.....the net result is only a small improvement, so this has hardly been
adopted universally, and won't be, IMHO. Their are also problems
with the cars using one coil per two cylinders...they need increased electrical
energy. So, modern cars CAN be hard on spark plugs....and CAN,
often, use precious metal plugs to advantage, strictly for TWO reasons:
1. The precious metal lasts longer, so gaps are more constant, erode less.
2. The precious metal plugs typically have smaller central electrode,
leading to higher temperature of the center electrode being possible and
somewhat easier spark start.
The bottom line is that spark plugs can have more center and outer electrode
erosion than the old days. One method of reducing the constantly
increasing spark gap is to use precious metals, which, for various reasons, do
not erode so quickly. I see ZERO reason to pay premium prices for a K
bike's spark plugs....at least not for Iridium or Platinum tips. If,
however, you are going to try for over 60,000 on your plugs, you might be
interested in trying them. I won't. There ARE reasons to use
certain types of spark plugs. In my own K1100LT, BMW went from the
recommended Bosch XR5DC to a dual ground electrode type XR7LDC. The
two have equivalent heat ranges in practice (in the K BIKE), ....never mind the
5 versus 7 here. The thin center and dual grounding electrode plug
lasts longer, and
offers every so slightly better ignition under some types of conditions....so
goes the theory. Many substitute NGK or other plugs quite successfully,
that are conventional electrode; for the somewhat special K bike plugs used on
some models. That they MIGHT be wasting a teeny bit of fuel is not
noticeable to them.
There is a LOT of snake oil surrounding spark plugs. Do NOT carry over my
dual grounding electrode remarks to include all other
engines. It is a KNOWN fact that the type of combustion chamber coupled
with the intake mixture direction, on the AIRHEADS, will show that a dual
electrode spark plug is WORSE than the stock single electrode. This has to
do with the pathway of the mixture to and through/over the spark plug gap
area. The so-called split tail or dual grounding electrode plugs
that are hyped, SplitFire, and others, are NOT of ANY help. Worse
....for airheads...are the multiple grounding electrode shrouded
centers...almost always MUCH WORSE than stock. I have pulled
multiple shrouded plugs (Bosch +4 Platinum's) out of airheads because they work
lousily....and I can quote other examples.
Equivalents,
Bosch and NGK:
NOTE!!
Plugs with 'BC' are the 1/2" reach for BOTTOM plugs in those
dual-plugged bikes that take 14 mm size
Bosch Bosch new
series
NGK
W5DC
7591
BP7ES
W5BC
7531
BP7HS
W6DC
7594
BP6ES
W6BC
7593
BP6HS
W7DC
7500
BP6ES
W7BC
7597
BP6HS
W8DC
7505
BP5ES
W8BC
7503
BP5HS
****Bosch plugs beginning with WR are resistor plugs!! They are not directly interchangeable with the spark plugs not having the "R"...no matter what Bosch or a salesman says!
***Warning!.....Bosch WR plugs may have the wrong gaps for airheads! check the gaps!
****WARNING!....Bosch
plugs with a + sign at the ending MIGHT really be resistor
plugs!!...even if the part number does NOT have an R in it!!
It has
been reported that Bosch has been putting their resistor plugs in
the small cardboard boxes that are marked for the non-resistor
plugs. Also reported that the number on the box for
non-resistor used to start as 0-241-; and Bosch MAY be putting
resistor plugs into those boxes, with the boxes showing
0-242-. My answer to this is to NOT trust what the
box says...open it and see what is printed on the plug base
metal. I'm anal enough to use an ohmmeter on the center
electrode!
Here is an enlarged picture showing what one Bosch box end
looks like. Do not trust anything on that box end...look at
the markings on the plug metal itself.

Use spark plugs that have extended
nose/tip.....extended tips (extended nose) are important for
proper combustion on an airhead engine. Only true
racing engines might not have, in some circumstances, such
non-extended noses.
Note: sometimes spark plugs from one manufacturer are
in-between a heat range of another manufacturer, or have a
slightly wider heat range capability;....thus you see the Bosch 6
and 7 series being covered by the NGK 6 series.
4. There is no 'official' specification for spark plug manufacturer's on what the resistor in a resistor spark plug must be. If that resistor is a coil of wire, or a resistor that happens to be under maybe 2500 ohms, you MIGHT have a FAILURE of the 1981+ electronic ignition system....a pricey failure. I suggest: 1. Use proper caps with real resistors, such as the Bosch or Beru or NGK. 2. Don't use resistor plugs; don't use resistance wires. 3. Use of 1000 ohm caps is acceptable in some situations (points), as noted. Below is a chart on NGK spark plug caps, which are very popular with Airheads. Very commonly available is the LB01EP and LB01F; and LB05 series.
Revisions:
04/22/2003: clarifications and emphasis here and there.
08/09/2003: edit for clarity
08/13/2004: minor editing for additional clarity, including
more detailed information on previously anti-seized threads.
09/13/2005: Add section on resistor plugs and wires, etc.
01/11/2007: update with latest information, and add the NGK
chart
03/25/2007: add equivalents, Bosch and NGK
03/27/2007: Rearrange order of last items on page, add more
information on the Bosch Plugs problems.
09/16/2007: Clean up
01/06/2008: remove bad hyperlink to old Bosch plugs at
automotive-tradition.de
01/15/2008: Totally revise the article, combining
information on holes, etc., from Engine Internals, ETC.
10/01/2008: add section expanding on special spark plugs