© Copyright 2014, R. Fleischer
put into base stock oils to help form better 'thin oil films', so the
oil is not pounded-out by impact forces. Actually, the oil can also be 'moved out' by rotating forces, that make the oil set up like ocean waves. Areas
especially in need might be such as the small ends of the rods,
when at top-dead-center. Very
LITTLE engine wear is from dynamic friction...that is, from
rotating, or constantly shearing movements. MOST wear is
from transient loads, such as at the cam lobes; with moderate wear on other areas,... during COLD STARTUP. Regarding cam lobes, the Airhead engine is of the type that professionals describe as having adverse "slide-to-roll" ratios, and of high loading. These types of engines are common to those of "flat-type" cam/rocker/follower systems, such as on the old VW Beetle, the Porsche 356, early Corvette's, even the Ford Pinto. Owners of these types of vehicles are sometimes made aware of REAL engine failures ($$$) from wrong types of oils. In particular camshaft and lifter wear. Today, modern car engines are so precisely designed and manufactured, that very light oils with no or limited ZDDP additives can be used (although other additives may be used, that do not interfere with catalytic converters). NOT SO with MANY early engines.
Much has been said about synthetic oils, and mostly it is about how much better they are than petroleum oils. While based on quite a few facts, many things said are misleading. Especially misleading is that oil change intervals may be increased GREATLY. While relatively true (doubling, or a bit more perhaps in some situations) for the lubricating qualities, it is NOT necessarily true as far as the additives for swelling the seals (without which the seals would shrink and leak); and it is even more not necessarily true for the ability of the particular oil to deal with acids that accumulate in the oil. Fuels contain sulfurs which react with moisture from combustion, condensation, etc., to form acids. Petroleum oils, as opposed to most full synthetic oils, also contain sulfurs. Very short trips, particularly in cold weather, let moisture accumulate in the oil. Lots of cold weather starts and low miles per start, all lead to oil contamination and degradation. Some synthetic oils are compounded with longer-lasting additives to deal with contamination, & oil change intervals can be safely extended, DEPENDING on your riding habits, whether you do many very short trips (less than 40 or so miles), etc. You may have heard that it takes 10 miles or more to heat up the oil enough to 'burn-off' accumulated moisture (moisture in the oil is VERY damaging over the long term). The wording of those statements should be: "begin to burn-off". Under about 8 miles or so, little moisture is burned-off, and it takes about 20 to be meaningful.
Most modern seals are neoprene or silicon types, hardly needing specialized swelling agents. For Airheads, one of the important protective additives is some form of ZDDP/ZDTP for flat tappet (flat cam follower) type of operation, in enough...but not way too much...concentration. The early classic K bikes, roughly 1983-1986 K100 type bikes, also need this protection.
There are a lot of additives in oils. Some protect against absorbed moisture and MANY other potential problems. SOME additives 'burn off' rather too easily, leaving the oil without enough. Additives are used for many functions. Just how often to change oils, based on time and mileage, depends CONSIDERABLY on how the engine is operated, the type of oil, etc.
Use of super-premium or even just premium oils is sometimes warranted, sometimes not; depending on many things, especially including how long you will own the vehicle, over how many miles. In the over-all expense of operating a vehicle, oil is almost always a very miniscule cost; thus, use of a better oil, that protects better, is something that USUALLY will pay off....particularly if the owner intends to keep the vehicle a long time.
There are a LOT of specialized tests done on oils, that are not generally talked about, besides between lubrication engineers. While I mention, in this long oil essay article, how some oils 'burn off' some of their oil rather quickly, I don't get into it deeply. But, it can affect your wallet....compared to oils that don't seem to hardly burn much....all in the SAME engine, same circumstances of use, etc. Just one of these tests is called the NOACK. That test is supposed to simulate what happens at the extreme temperatures oils are exposed to in all engines, at very specific places. Most of the time, when engine oil temperatures are talked about, it means the oil temperature in oil tanks (dry sump engines) or oil pans. But, you probably know that oil that is circulating in the HEAD is exposed to much higher temperatures around the valve guide, and other areas of the valve, particularly, of course, at the exhaust valve area. But, think about the CYLINDER AND PISTON AREAS. The cylinder walls ARE lubricated, in EXTREMELY thin oil layer amounts....fraction of a drop perhaps, over the whole cylinder. That oil comes in contact with the VERY hot top piston ring(s). Thus, the NOACK test is done at 250°C (yes, Centigrade). That is 482°F !! All engine lubricating oils will 'evaporate' or are 'burned', or otherwise changed, by such temperatures.
Unless your engine is using a very tiny amount of oil per oil change period, your actual oil cost might be considerably higher with some oils that 'burn off' quickly...if you have to add oil.
This is just one tiny example of 'oil talk'.
The balance of this article delves fairly deeply into lubricating oils for vehicles, how they do their job, recommendations, hints, etc.
ZDDP (and ZDTP):
NOTE that these additives are NOT in all engine oils, and when they are, the concentrations vary...a LOT!
ZDDP (zinc dialkyl-dithiophosphate) is a common anti-wear additive for use in mineral-based oils. ZDTP is approximately the equivalent (zinc di-thiophosphate), which is used in synthetic oils. Both are usually just said to be ZDDP in common usage. Both have been used as an anti-wear ingredient in engine oil for many decades. The zinc and phosphorus ingredients are most effective when they are used together. ZDDP and ZDTP are some of the many additives that are put into conventional motor oil to improve lubrication qualities.
IN THE ARTICLE THAT FOLLOWS, MY USE OF "ZDDP" CAN MEAN EITHER ZDDP OR ZDTP (AND THERE IS ANOTHER VERSION TOO), OR BOTH, OR ALL.
Many premium motorcycle oils are produced with large percentages of synthetic components, and may well have quality additives that will last longer than the commonly accepted (and often WRONG!) 3,000 mile change intervals. It depends CONSIDERABLY on the 'quality' and amount of additives, and particularly how the motorcycle is ridden....such as very short 3 mile trips in high humidity or cold weather perhaps...versus over 20 mile average trips. Changing oil too often is also, contrary to popular belief, not a great idea. I know that sounds wrong....and the reasons are complex, so I won't get into them here. If you do not believe, me, do some of your own research!! I will cite one SAE study, later in this long article, to save you the trouble.
There is also a POSSIBLE problem with the word synthetic. Due to a 'lawsuit' (not absolutely true, but best thought of as a lawsuit) won by Castrol (versus Mobil), a judge made a ruling that even today should be considered wrong (in MY opinion!). He ruled, my words here, that a highly refined petroleum oil, not REALLY a complete full-synthetic oil, can, if the manufacturer wished, be called synthetic. Because of this ruling, so-called part, or even full-synthetic oils!! that are on the market may not truly be high quality REAL synthetic oils. Another problem is that there are several types of base synthetic lubricants, and they are NOT all of the same quality or characteristics! I will get into them later in this article. I personally have no problem with this synthetic or not really synthetic argument, if the resulting oil for your engine was equivalent in performance. UNfortunately, they are NOT, usually, very close.
I am going to be BLUNT here. Castrol...and some other companies....know quite well that the Public is not knowledgeable about oils, and these companies know that the public is enamored with buzz-words, such as Synthetic, Laser, etc. These companies also know that the vast majority of products are purchased by PRICE, not quality. Many companies have made quite a lot of money, for decades, by selling worthless products for vehicles, like certain additives you put in the fuel tank, or the engine oil. I am NOT saying Castrol products are like this, not at all. What I DO want you to understand is that there is a lot of misleading advertising, part-truths, insufficient information, etc. I suggest you be somewhat cynical about what you purchase. You probably have no huge reasons to believe ME, over someone else, or some advertising. Maybe, just maybe, you will read this article, and some of my others, and get the idea that I am primarily an educator, trying to help those who do their own work, or be knowledgeable about what is done to their vehicles by others.
Another problem is that, except for most of the specialty motorcycle oil makers (who are better at NOT changing good formulas), commonly available oils can...and always do.... have their formulas modified, without the oil makers telling you.
The bottom-line, SIMPLIFIED, about "synthetic" oil, is that for MOST PRACTICAL purposes, if they contain reasonable amounts of ZDDP or ZDTP (for your AIRHEAD bike or other vehicle that really should have it), they are ALL likely going to be OK and you CAN go further than you may think before needing an oil change. Some will burn off faster at the beginning, and that costs-you; but you will probably overlook this.
Diesel and/or 'fleet' oils like Rotella-T and Delo and Delvac are all likely to have SOMEWHAT reduced amounts of ZDDP in them now...and perhaps even less as time goes on. Delo is perfectly OK for a gasoline engine. These oils are NOT 'only for diesels'. If curious enough, get the manufacturer's literature and read the fine print, particularly the characters (letters and numbers) that describe the approved service for the oil. While air-cooled motorcycle engines are much harder on oils than water cooled motorcycle engines (or car engines), these 'fleet' oils may well do just fine for you. You may save some money, if that is important to you regarding engine oil.
Your Airhead NEEDS ZDDP or ZDTP; but does not need the very high dispersant and some other qualities of SOME diesel oils that might, especially in the past on CD diesel oils, give problems. I do not recommend willy-nilly all modern diesel oils for Airheads. You might carefully select one, but I am not fully endorsing them any longer. I do think that probably Rotella and Rotella-T, and Delo, are OK.. at the time I updated this particular paragraph (April 2011). ZDDP is not all that needed on Classic K bikes, although the first several years (1983-1986 perhaps) of the Classic K bikes probably do better with ZDDP in their oils, and ALL K engines can actually benefit a bit. Modern car oils have little or no ZDDP, as the zinc component of ZDDP tends to poison catalytic converters.
Modern car oils are typically energy saving (and so marketed and marked),
are usually in thin grades such as
5W30,...and are absolutely NOT compatible with your Airhead, and
not good for your K bike either.
There is a lot of confusion over SAE graded oils, and ZDDP. Very simply-put, if a viscosity grade of oil is deemed by the SAE and vehicle industry to NOT be a car/truck grade, then the oil manufacturer may put such as a goodly dose of ZDDP into the oil. Doesn't mean they HAVE. 20W50 is such a grade. Thus, a premium motorcycle oil maker MAY put lots of ZDDP into a 20W50. He may do it in 10W40, 15W50, etc....as these are not considered car oils by SAE.
More information is in my 52B article and my viscosity article.
Thick oils, that is, oils with
higher viscosities, have more internal friction, and CAN support
larger loads....but!...there's always a but!, EH?......HIGH mechanical pressures of/in the parts themselves INcrease oil viscosity. This is another of those common sense things that makes you THINK that it is "WRONG"...but.... yes, it is true. When oil is inside a
common bearing, and the bearing has lots of pressure (think conrods, as
one example), the effective oil's OWN thickness INcreases. This is so
even with the ends of the bearing open to 'release trapped oil'. This is a special
property of "thin oil films", and has very little to do with
mechanical pressure in and of itself as a trapped medium.
Yes, I know this all sounds quite wrong.
A THIN (lower viscosity number) oil is vastly easier to pump and thereby get through the 'system', and INTO VITAL AREAS QUICKLY, and will support massively heavy loads. So, a manufacturer uses tighter tolerances on those bearings, less clearance and a thinner oil. This engine then needs more oil pump pressure, but that INcreases fluid friction. No entirely free lunch here. Another factor is high rotational speeds. The faster the surface speed, the more the oil is formed into a cushion, which allows even higher loading. There are many types of surfaces in our motorcycles. Some slide, some roll, some are fluid-based. There are a lot of forces and peculiar things at work.
Oil and oiling/lubrication is HARDLY just some sort of liquid slippery stuff!
What folks sometimes want to know is how lubrication really deals with friction. You
can't eliminate friction on a practical basis; but, you can
minimize it. Many decades ago, schooling about
friction was a sort of 'hills and valleys' type of discussion in
describing forces that resist sliding motion. In other
words, parts that looked smooth, really had microscopic hills and
valleys and it was those that caused the friction of the parts. That
concept is rather obsolete now. It still applies,
of course, to such as breaking-in of new piston rings, and most
other areas... to SOME extent. BUT, today, with
modern fine-machining, the MORE important
concept is ADHESION; and, lubrication engineers may
sometimes find extreme problems that they need to solve: cold-welding of surfaces in contact, as ONE example.
a full film of lubricant separates surfaces, the only friction is
from motion WITHIN the fluid. When you stop to think about this, it DOES, YES, sound crazy! Common Sense is wrong, for the 3rd time, in this article you are reading.
Here is what really happens: The fluid (OIL) splits into layers. The top layer sticks to the surface, bottom layer sticks to the lower surface, and each successive layer travels at a lower speed, which shears the layers on either side. Oil "film" is what does the lubricating (not absolutely true on a REAL engineering basis, but good enough for us, here). There are several types of 'oil films'. The hydrodynamic film is only perhaps 0.001" thick in a 1 inch bearing. Surfaces are kept apart by several functions, one of which is the hydrostatic function which is primarily from oil pressure from the oil pump. Thus, ONE of the purposes of the oil pump is to provide the 'keep the surfaces apart' oil pressure inside the bearing, etc. This is critical when there are slow heavy loads and also for starting up of the engine. Please be sure to read this small paragraph again....oil slipperiness is not really involved! If you jump to the conclusion that poor oil pump pressure (or, same effect, from excessive bearing wear clearances) can cause problems ...you would be correct.
If the oil film gets too thin, metal contact is possible. Typically this
won't happen until the film is ten times less thick than that
0.001" mentioned. At that
point, you want additives like ZDDP, etc. Some additives found in larger amounts, in diesel oils in particular, can cause problems in HIGH SPEED engines. Thus, one of the reasons I am hesitant to fully approve diesel oils in high rpm gasoline engines, is those problems. Some of the old CD-x diesel oils were like that. NOTE that diesels are used in many cars, particularly common in Europe, and some of these engines are RELATIVELY high rpm types. Thus, the specifications for diesel engine lubricating oils has changed over the years. The Europeans are very much better at this than the Americans.
From what you have read so far, you understand that you do not want too thick an oil, nor do you want too thin an oil. There IS A REASON that 5W30 or 10W30...and possibly 10W40.....are all too thin (and have other not great characteristics).... for most Airheads and K bikes
riding in mild temperatures. There IS A REASON that 15W50 or 20W50 oil is most often recommended.
This also applies to K-bike engines. There are even oils with a wider range, like 10W50. While MUCH less true today, decades ago, multi-grade oils in the wider ranges were not all that good, not much better than straight grades, at least after some miles. Not so today. Today, straight weight oils have little use in engines.
As parts speed up, other factors come into play. Required or specified oil viscosity can be juggled somewhat by the engine manufacturer. INcreasing viscosity will allow more loading, but then you get higher temperatures; and less immediate oiling. SPEED of the parts means faster shearing of all layers, but speed helps form a cushion, so higher speed means higher allowed loading (read that again, and think about what you have heard about 'lugging' an engine). The best approach for a manufacturer is usually to use a reasonably low viscosity oil, with very good thinning characteristics (high viscosity index) so the oil does not thin too much with temperature rise.
When the K bikes came out, BMW contracted with Spectro Oils to produce an oil specifically for the water-cooled K bikes. BMW then promoted that oil (a bit slyly when they did that for Airheads, it wasn't the very best for them, although 'adequate'). The oil that Spectro made for BMW was NOT Golden Spectro, and was not standard Spectro either. Golden Spectro was a BETTER oil, than BMW oil, IMO. There were problems with early K bikes with petroleum oils, that were mostly cured with the use of full synthetic oils, at the starter sprag clutch. BMW modified the design more than once. Once in awhile we still hear of a starter sprag clutch problem. In the very beginning of the K-bike production, BMW was having problems with the K bike starter sprag drive clutch not engaging, and finally BMW redesigned it by adding more sprags and more holes for better oil flow. The updated assembly gave far fewer problems, but some problems still remained now and then. BMW offered a full synthetic oil later on. Mobil 1 works quite well, with VERY FEW reported problems with ANY starter sprag clutch. What happened when the starter sprag clutch began to fail is that it would slip after some sort of unseen glazing film or wear (shape wear?) accumulated; and, perhaps, some loss of sprag clutch springs tension;...and synthetic oils helped a lot....as did some synthetic additives in the Spectro synthetic oil as well as the original Spectro from BMW. The Mobil 1 brand has 15W50 and 20W50 oils specifically for motorcycles; although Mobil does change, irregularly, on the exact formulation of what is being sold. They do have an oil that was designed for Harley Davidson's, the V-Twin oil.....there have been various names for that oil over the years. It has a goodly amount of ZDDP in it, and seems to be very good in Airheads. I prefer the 15W50 Mobil 1 for the K1, K75, K100, K1100, K1200. However, some have used that oil for the Airheads. I haven't made up my mind on it.
Rislone, and a few other additives, perhaps the stronger CD2... used once if needed.... would sometimes free up the K bike starter sprag clutch, which is a VERY HIGH labor-charge job to replace; and the part is not cheap either. It is actually possible to remove a failed later type starter sprag clutch and clean it (PROPERLY!!!) and have it work again...but few do that, due to the intense labor, if the cleaning does not work well.
BTW...BMW is hardly the only company having starter motor clutch problems. The common Honda Gold Wing uses what amounts to fat rollers or roller bearings if you wish, to provide a one-way clutch, and they have a habit of gumming up from oil residue varnishes, etc. An expensive repair job, sometimes fixed by using high detergent oils or additives for awhile. The BMW K bike starter sprag clutch is a high cost repair too, and the same high detergent additive routine might work here too. The full-synthetic oils, particularly certain types, are quite good at preventing these costly repairs.
Synthetic and Conventional Oils:
This particular section was plagiarized from several combined internet articles, and then highly edited by me.
I claim NO copyright for this particular section. Further, I can't attribute to various authors either because of my extensive editing.
Oils are categorized in groups by the type of base stock they are made from.
Group one oils:
Group Two oils: This is the standard petroleum base stock that all modem conventional petroleum oils are made from. Quality varies widely depending on where it was "dug up from". Even in "finished" form it can contain various amounts of paraffin (wax), impurities left over from refining and from the ground it came from. Chemically it is a hodge podge of different sized hydrocarbon molecules, not all of which "get along with each other" ...so to speak. The result of this is a product that produces sludge, varnish and mechanical wear as it ages and breaks down in service. That does NOT mean that this is not a good usable oil for many purposes. These oils have steadily been improved over the years as API (American Petroleum Institute) services requirements have gotten stricter. However as modern engines pump more horsepower from smaller engines with less total oil sump capacity and the level of horsepower/torque transmitted though today's light weight fuel efficient drive trains continues to climb, lubricant manufacturers find that conventional petroleum oils really just cannot be improved much farther. Hence the move we see by automakers to synthetic fluids; both in engines and transmission/differentials. Combine that with the need to improve fuel economy (and synthetic lubricants have the ability to do just that) and you can see why "factory filled with synthetic" is becoming more and more common in cars and some bikes. I am not about to dig deeper in this Group Two into arguments about super-modified petroleum oils that are or are not to be considered synthetics. Castrol won that argument in court, as you saw from reading much earlier and below in this article.
Group Three oils: Group three oils are petroleum oils that have been hydroisomerized, "hydro-cracked" as it is commonly called. This is the most stringent level of petroleum oil refining. Much of the paraffin and impurities have been removed and its performance on any number of industry tests is substantially better than Group Two. Although not made from truly synthesized engineered molecules and as such not a true synthetic oil (as far as I am concerned!, see just below paragraph), it does offer a goodly portion of the benefits you would expect from a true synthetic and in fact is usually sold and marketed as a 100% synthetic product. The vast majority of synthetic oils on the market are actually made from group three oils because of a "lawsuit" some years ago between Mobil and Castrol, that totally changed the synthetic oil industry. Because of this lawsuit the buying public has largely been duped into believing that these oils are actually a real synthetic. Mobil Inc., makers of Mobil One (Mobil 1), sued Castrol Inc., makers of Castrol Syntec, accusing them of marketing a hydro-cracked petroleum oil as a synthetic. Mobil's primary argument was that Castrol Inc. had pursued an unfair market advantage because Group Three based oils are much less expensive to manufacture than true synthetic oils, yet Castrol was marketing Syntec as a 100% synthetic product. Castrol could make it for less, sell it for less and un-fairly under-cut ($) all it's competitors in the synthetic oil market with a oil that was not truly a synthetic product. In the end though, Castrol convinced the judge that a Group Three based oil has been sufficiently refined that it should be able to be marketed along with true synthetic oils. Basically the court expanded the definition of synthetic to include group three based oils. Because the synthetic oil market is the fastest growing part of the lubricants industry, manufacturers are eager to jump up and grab the profits for the sexy-customer-grabbing-word "synthetic" on the bottle. Some car makers are starting to specify synthetic oils, particularly on turbocharged engines. Group three oils do not have the performance of true custom- engineered synthetic oils, especially in temperature extremes. The vast majority of what is being sold as synthetic are really Group Three petroleum-based oils. The public for the most part doesn't know the difference.
Group Four oils: Polyalpha olefin and related olefin oligomers and olefin polymers. Synthetic hydrocarbon or PAO's as they are commonly called, are a true man-made-engineered base oil produced by catalytic reaction with various alpha olefin compounds. PAO's are widely recognized as providing outstanding performance for many lubricant applications because of very high viscosity index, a wide operational temperature range and because they are thermal and shear stable. PAO's also have low promotion of corrosion and are compatible with mineral oils and the range of materials that engines and other machinery are manufactured from. The molecular structure of PAO's are easily customized for use in all kinds of applications from automotive to industrial and are widely used in motor oils, gear lubes, high temperature/extreme pressure greases, compressor oils and hydraulic fluids.
This particular section was plagiarized from several combined internet articles, and then highly edited by me. I claim NO copyright for this particular section. Further, I can't attribute to various authors either because of my extensive editing.
Oils are categorized in groups by the type of base stock they are made from.
This group comprises all synthetic oils other than PAO's. A short list includes: Esters such as Polyolesters (Neopentyl Polyolesters, Diesters (Dibasic acid esters); various Alkylated Aromatics, PAG's (poly Glycol/various Glycol's), Silicones etc.
This group of synthetics is primarily used for various industrial and aviation applications. Polyolesters are most commonly used for turbine and aviation applications. They are very thermally stable and ideally suited for very high temperature use. Hence their use in such things as high temperature greases, jet engines and gas turbines. They have a very low coefficient of friction and are sometimes added in small amounts to mineral oils and synthetic oils to lower the coefficient of friction of the finished product. Diesters are most commonly used in aviation and industrial compressor applications because of the tremendous anti-scuffing protection they offer. They are often added in small amounts to PAO-based two-cycle oils as this feature is very beneficial to a two-cycle motor oil. Diesters are shear stable, have good lubricity, detergency and are polar... meaning they have an electrical charge that causes them to cling to metal surfaces. THAT is a desirable trait for most lubricants. Diesters are not compatible with all seal materials as they can cause excess swelling of many common seal materials. Because of this they are often added in small amounts to automotive PAO based oils to provide positive seal function. Silicones offer wide temperature performance and are sometimes used in compressor applications although this use has fallen out of favor in recent years. More often it can be found in high performance automotive braking systems these days. I HIGHLY suggest you do NOT use DOT5 silicone brake fluids. A discussion of why is in the brake and chemicals articles.
Group Five oils:
Why Choose Synthetic Lubricants?
Motor oils are comprised of two parts, the base oil and additive package. The base oil comprises 80-90% of the oil by volume and the additives the remaining 10-20%. There are five groups of base oils stated above: Group I, II, III, IV and V. Groups I to III are refined from crude oil containing tars, asphalts, waxes, aromatics & other things. These crude oils are "cleaned up", to the extent possible, by hydrocracking and filtering. The group III base oils are the best of this genre. However, they still contain variably-sized molecules and some contaminants that can result in sludge, varnish and other deposits in your engine. Moreover, the quality of group III base oils vary greatly due to differences in the feedstocks and refining methods utilized.
Synthetic oils are group IV (PAOs) and group V (esters) base oils. These synthetic oils are "man-made" synthesized uniform molecular structures that significantly improve the efficiency and effectiveness of these oils relative to their petroleum oil competitors. More specifically, these oils have lower coefficients of friction, better thermal (heat) and pour-point (cold weather performance) properties than do petroleum oils. Synthetic oils have no waxes, tars, or other contaminants to sludge or varnish your engine.
Synthetic lubricants are initially more expensive, but may pay off when you consider their extended oil life (and engine-life) capabilities, in addition to their improved performance.
One must be very cautious about using the various Group IV and V oils; they may not be compatible with seals in some vehicles, and as seals are usually made by more than one manufacturer, the seal material may not be necessarily compatible with an oil even though the seal has the SAME part number. Still, these are THE best performing oils.
If you need ZDDP in the oil, that is, you have an Airhead or early K motorcycle (and many other motorcycles not BMW)...be cautious, be sure the oil has ZDDP, perhaps at least 1000 ppm, and not over perhaps 1800 ppm. There are other characteristics that are important too. ZDDP is used generically here, as ZDTP is more likely to be in synthetic oils.
More...for the even more technically-minded, on oil functioning:
Looking at extremely tiny irregularities in as-machined and broken-in surfaces, a LOW viscosity oil allows the oil to creep into very small microscopic areas. As the load increases, the oil is squeezed between the parts and dynamically increases the oil viscosity; which allows higher load carrying. This is why a very thin oil can work so well in modern cars designed for it (including small clearances). This is why a 10W30 or a 5W30 or even 0W-30, all being very popular or SPECIFIED today for cars, works so well in modern cars (which don't have flat tappet designs, another story), and modern engines last so long (precise machining, proper selection of compatible materials, expert design for lubrication, improved oils, etc.). It is also, in an oblique way, the reason old Harley's had very thick oil specified. I'm NOT putting Harley down here, just telling real facts. One could say the same thing about many old engine designs. ...and some of this really does apply to such as flat tappet old performance cars, Porsche boxer engines, and so on (and Airheads)....as I described earlier herein.
Oil wedgingis a fundamental principle. Let me begin by discussing a rotating crankshaft; a crank journal, and a conrod big end. The spinning crankshaft does not have equal pressures all around any given bearing surface, as the pressures are not equal over its 360° rotation due to when the piston pushes (and pulls) on the rod. In the bearing area itself, the parts are ever-so-tiny eccentric to each other...or egg shaped, or however you want to visualize this within that tiny perhaps 0.001" bearing clearance. This eccentricity drags oil into a wedge-shaped layer between the journal and the bearing, which LIFTS UP THE SHAFT, so the shaft is SUPPORTED by the oil film. Yes, all this happens in that oh-so-thin mechanical clearance. AND, yes, it is true that the eccentric-ness comes mostly during break-in....so, another reason that break-in oil is changed sooner, rather than a 'normal' mileage.
Getting deeper into
how thin oil films work in the molecular region
is way too nerdy for even this article. It
would get into what is really meant by oiliness, adsorption, more
on hydrodynamic lubrication, how the film can be penetrated, and
When I studied
this sort of stuff, I kept my notes; and my industry information, and they, mostly typewritten on both sides of the paper, are several inches thick.
Lubrication is a VERY complex subject, it is still evolving.
ZDDP (or ZDTP) is important for Airhead engines. ALL ZDDP is NOT the same. Zinc dialkyldithiophosphate is both an antioxidant and an antiwear agent, and most formulations are somewhat volatile to a bit too volatile. As the oil standards specified by car makers and the SAE went from lower to higher letters (SG to SM, as example), the oils had less ZDDP. Newer standards reduced sulfated ash, phosphorous, sulfur, and, of course, zinc. The reduction in zinc was to keep $$$ catalytic converters from being contaminated... which reduces or eliminates their prime function; the other reductions were to lengthen the lifetime for the Oxygen Sensors on modern cars and bikes. Think about what I just said about oxygen sensors. You DO know that your K1100, etc., has one? Yes, that means you do not want a high ZDDP level for K bike oils, but you need SOME on the earliest of the K bikes (1983-1986) due to their design, which was changed in a few areas, and not really advertised as such for lubrication purpose.Thus, use of ZDDP and ZDTP in K bike oils is a trade-off.
Most SM oils still contain some ZDDP, but in a less volatile formulation. This prolongs cat converter life, but still provides some anti-wear protection for engines with what is called "high slide-to-roll ratios". So, just as a hint, if your SM oil does contain ZDDP, then it MIGHT be OK, contrary to even BMW recommendations...but you need to KNOW.
Oil drain intervals, etc: This is a vastly misunderstood item. My
information comes from REAL industry experts, not just my personal opinion.
It is true that car makers tests show that drain intervals of 7500 miles are usually OK,
even more in some instances. NOT NECESSARILY SO for your Airhead, especially with conventional dino (petroleum) oils. Oil wears-out (good enough term for us here) from high heat in air-cooled engines (particularly around the valves areas). NOTICE ALSO, that ...and this is hardly widespread
knowledge!!......fuel economy DEcreases quite a bit after about 4000 miles...as oils burn off the protective anti-friction additives. Popular belief is that ZDDP protection does not even come into play until things are awful (such as metal-to-metal)... this is not so.
I have mentioned how not changing oils TOO often is better...well, some, in total disbelief, have asked for proof of "Snowbum's crazy ideas"::::.......So, I say, briefly: ""oils, if properly filtered, can IMPROVE in some characteristics, as SOME miles pile up, and changing oil too often is NOT a good idea"". For just one of a number of articles on this subject: http://papers.sae.org/2007-01-4133/
Obviously, there are limits. Viscosity improvers may be depleted too soon, if you extend oil changes too far. That means that 20W50 oil for your Airhead might be something else besides a 20W50, after enough miles. If you had a motorcycle with the GEARBOX being lubricated by the engine oil, things can be much worse for the oil, as the gears WILL shear the longer-chain-molecules of the oil. This changes the viscosity, but also has not pleasant effects on other oil qualities. Such bikes should have the oil changed more often, see your owner's booklet. Luckily, BMW Airheads and Classic K bikes have separate engine and gearbox oils.
Oil recommendations for AIRHEADS:
For Airheads, due to the variability (I
think!) of some heat-treated parts, and due to the type of cam
and followers; I recommend the
(1) Mobil 1 V-Twin in 20W50 grade. You can usually extend the drain intervals due to this
being a full synthetic oil. This oil can be pricey, and I am not sure it is worth the money;
but drain intervals, assuming longer touring miles than city traffic miles, could be quite
long. This oil has plenty of ZDDP or ZDTP, & is a good formulation in all respects. I
have one big reservation about this oil IN AIRHEADS.....you might get some leakage at
the seals. Only SOME FEW have reported this. I don't use this oil myself in my
(2) Mobil 1 (not the V-Twin version) in 15W50 is probably usable, but I can't give a blanket
100% OK. BUT, if you want to use a synthetic, this is likely one of the best (see #1,
above, too). Perhaps, in mild to hot weather, (1), above, is better.
(3) Golden Spectro 4 in 20W50. A no-nonsense premium oil, it can also have SOMEwhat
extended drain intervals, as it is a part-synthetic. I have considerable experience using
this oil. Excellent quality & has an excellent base stock. It is my favorite Airhead engine
oil. It's formulation has remained constant. There are NO seal problems with this oil, on
ANY Airhead, of ANY year.
(4) Golden Spectro 4 in 10W40. Same comments as above, but use only when the weather
is under perhaps 40°F.
NOTE that Spectro also makes a FULL synthetic oil. It costs more, is better, and only you can make the decision if it is worth the money.
(5) BMW 20W50 NON-synthetic motorcycle oil. A good oil, not as good as the above oils.
(6) BMW full synthetic oil: I don't have experience & don't have enough information to
(7) Valvoline 4-stroke motorcycle oil, in 20W50, or 10W40 for quite cold areas. Not quite as
good as (1) to (4), but good enough. Phosphorus content is 0.103%; calcium 0.182%;
zinc 0.112%; sodium 0.052%. For those not wanting to chance seal problems with Mobil 1
versions IN AIRHEADS, yet wanting a less expensive oil than the BMW or Golden
Spectro 4, this might be a good choice for AIRHEADS.
(8) Shell Rotella-T in grade 15W40; calcium 0.27%; zinc 0.135%; phosphorus 0.120%. This
is a good oil, can be purchased at quite a savings in larger than quart sizes. It is often
referred to as a 'diesel' oil, which it also is. It is possible that the formulation will be
changed, but that is the latest laboratory test information I have on it, and due to those
tests...which also cover other qualities of this oil, I STILL think it likely quite decent-enough
for Airheads. This comment is being made in October 2012.
(9) DELO 400 oil contains 0.119% phosphorus and 0.148% zinc. Last time I looked the spec
sheet was showing those values, and dated in 2011. It has always been a good oil.
(10) I cannot recommend Castrol motor oils, of ANY type EXCEPT for: Castrol's 4T oil, (and
Grand Prix oil, which is the SAME OIL) in either grade 10W40 or 20W50, as
appropriate to your climate. These oils are SG rated and formulated. Zinc component
is 1100ppm; Calcium component is 1900 ppm; Phosphorus component is 1000 ppm.
Do NOT use cheap energy saving (so marked, and probably have starburst symbol) car oils in your motorcycle, particularly NOT in Airheads.You CAN in an emergency.
Classic K bike engine oil recommendations:
Because of potential $$$ problems with the starter sprag clutch, and some other things, I am recommending ONLY FULL SYNTHETIC OILS for the engine. The owners booklet has a chart of the recommended grades. Myviscosity article has the chart too...a late version. My recommendation includes Mobil 1, and you do not need the V-Twin version of Mobil 1, but if you have a 1983-1986 K bike, that oil is better.
Do NOT use non-premium oil filters in your Airhead. Use the two-part hinged filter, if you can. The K bike can safely use all sorts of filters, I use BMW branded ones, you don't have to. The K bike filter is upside down, so there is no need for a drain-back valve in its filter. NOTE: I do NOT like ANY FRAM filter.
****DO NOT use K & N air filters!! *** .. if you want to know why, see the K & N filter article:click
ZINC....ZDDP...ZDTP; 'special' break-in oils, etc......expanded section...:
Just what really is ZDDP....ETC.???:
Yes, it is true, that that ZDDP has excellent anti-scuff properties. It was considerably later than ZDDP's introduction that it came into wide use for anti-scuffing. In the 1960s, high performance flat-tappet camshafts were common. It was found that a zinc level of 0.07% was very helpful. Back in the 1960s, all new camshafts were generally phosphate-coated, and together with the ZDDP in the engine oil, the brand-new camshafts and lifters were protected from premature wear, particularly during the critical break-in period. As engines became more powerful, and pressures on parts increased, the level of zinc was increased to 0.09%. Oils changed too, becoming much more complex, and additives for friction modifications, antioxidants, detergents, etc., became common and more sophisticated. Fuel economy began to be of some concern, and the zinc content was continually increased, with premium oils commonly having as much as 0.2%....into the 1980s and 1990s.
That is why ZDDP or ZDTP is helpful for K bike engines, but particularly the earliest ones, which had different metallurgy but more important, different cam characteristics, etc.
ZDDP protects valve tips and pushrod tips. Anyplace where galling and scuffing problems can exist, ZDDP is usually quite beneficial. However, on a practical basis, large amounts of ZDDP are not necessarily a good thing for such as a water-cooled BMW K bike engine. So, ZDDP has that glass-forming coating, established at break-in, and this is quite microscopic, and then it protects in other ways, as time and miles accumulate (not to mention that it renews that glass like coating as needed, one hopes).
It is not zinc, but phosphorus content that is the biggest item of importance in ZDDP, as far as wear goes. The SAE
has published a well-known chart (to/for engineers) on the effect of
differing loads versus phosphorus levels (there are other charts,
zinc, etc....not important right here). Most of these types of
charts (there are a lot of them) are presented as lifter loads,
in pounds, versus ZDDP or Phosphorus, and the criteria is scuffing of
parts. What is interesting about the charts is that the curve
is NOT linear, particularly so at LOWER concentrations of
phosphorus. At lower loadings, only a concentration of maybe
0.03% is needed. At higher loadings...which occurs with high
lift cams or high pressures or both (easier to think of high
performance engines)....concentrations of 0.08% are needed. What
is needed means that MORE than that amount is required, due to burnoff of the additives, and for a safety factor.
One last thing on this concentration business. Way more than needed is NOT good. The charts show that if the Phosphorus concentration goes over 0.14%, then wear starts to INcrease. At 0.20%, wear is definitely accelerating fast. This means that there is an optimum range of ZDDP concentration (and, for the revised modern oils, the Phosphorus concentration). That is why you will see that many makers of motorcycle oils keep the phosphorus component down AROUND 0.12%. BTW.. .that is same as 1200ppm.
NOTE that some very pricey specialty oils are made with VERY HIGH concentrations. They are marketed for special break-in purposes primarily. I am NOT AT ALL in favor of these FOR YOUR BIKE.
ZDDP amounts have been reduced in MOST ALL car engine oils, in fact, now ZDDP is almost completely eliminated. That is because the additive contaminted the $$$ catalytic converters. At the early stages of reductions, phosphorus limits were lowered to 0.10%, and zinc levels were dropped also...but quite long ago. In 2004 came the so-called Tier 2 emissions standards, and OEM warranties changed to 10 years or 100K miles, and phosphorus dropped again, to 0.08%...and zinc went down to 0.09%.The levels are much lower now....or, gone.
There is no question that, for recent generation car engines, modern oils are all that is needed. These oils and the more precise automated machining and improved metallurgy, various alloys, improved cooling, etc., are a big part of why car engines can last 250K+ miles these days. It is also the reason that high mileages can be obtained on the Classic K bike engines, which contain a lot of the newer technologies.
Establishing protective layers or very hard layers, on cams and followers, is dealt with by many small changes in modern engines, allows break-in of the cam and followers and other parts, when brand-new, without needing ZDDP.
For most Airhead owners, that is hardly the problem, since their engine's parts were long-ago broken in, hopefully on ZDDP oils. BUT, the zinc (and phosphorus) are needed continuously in Airheads; and if the cam, etc., was NOT heat treated well-enough, or perhaps not broken in on a proper oil....deterioration will set in. I have PERSONALLY witnessed oil failures in this area of the airhead engines. High spring loads compound the problems.In a nutshell, EPA regulations, SAE and engine makers and car makers have all 'conspired' against the type of oil YOU NEED for your Airhead. Luckily such oils are still available.
Racing: break-in, etc:
Some, particularly in racing or maybe just overly nerdy street vehicle owners who own old vehicles, may use a dedicated break-in oil, with a ZDDP additive; they
may also have used a coating on the cam, etc., during assembly, for extra protection at first start-up.
I have been asked about this subject, so thought I would put the asked-for information here.
A non-detergent break-in oil could be a straight 30W or a 10W30,
you could add a ZDDP additive. You do not have to do that.
Your regular engine oil needs to be AT LEAST 1000 PPM of ZDDP. Many diesel and fleet oils contain adequate ZDDP. There are specialty oil makers who have oils specifically for flat tappet engines, break-in and regular running.
So, for the EXTREMELY NERDY.....(and DO keep in mind that I recommended earlier in this article that you do NOT USE SUPER HIGH ZDDP TYPE ADDITIVE OILS!!)...there ARE problems with using too much ZDDP!
Joe Gibbs oils...BR and BR30. They have a special break-in oil, with 2800 ppm zinc...!!!...this oil was developed for quick break-in and dyno runs. They have a BR oil in 15W50. These specialty oils are often used where the oil is preheated, the new engine started, and is put on the dyno right away. They also have a Hot Rod Oil, with 1200 ppm ZDDP, in 15-50, 10W30, etc. It is LOW detergent...did you know that HIGH detergent levels can wash-away the ZDDP somewhat? This oil has extra additives for especially long term storage for classic cars...rust protection, corrosion protection, etc. One change a year for the typical classic car show type use. The Joe Gibbs MicroZol BR and BR30 are good oils, if used for the design purposes. The Hot Rod Oil is good for long term storage.
Brad Penn company. American Refining Group makes Brad Penn Racing oils. They offer a straight 30W oil with high levels of zinc and other antiscuff additives, called Penn Grade 1. ...specially formulated to help rings seat fast.
Royal Purple company...makes a Engine Break-in Oil.
ZDDP additives from such as Comp Cams (159 ZDDP additive).
Red Line has a high-ZDDP break-in oil additive.
Trick Flow TFS-9400.
Isky Racing ZDDP PLUS.
Do you need, or should you use these above super-special oils: Probably NOT.
rule of thumb for decades, and still good, is that you should
NOT use a full-synthetic oil for break-in....especially if new
piston rings were installed or a fresh cylinder boring or honing job.
For Airheads: Some past 'wisdom' was that the cam, rings, etc., will be broken-in within 500-1000 or so miles, and then you can switch to a decent ZDDP-containing non-break-in oil. Frankly, don't bother, just start and break-in the Airheads on one of the recommended oils. I use Golden Spectro 4 usually in 20W50, more rarely in 10W40. Break-in an engine that is newly rebuilt, or overhauled, or a top-end has been done, according to my break-in article.
***Under NO circumstances, but an emergency, EVER use a car type engine oil if the container has a API starburst Energy Saving symbol; NEVER EVER for break-in...and try to never use it at all....
© Copyright 2014, R. Fleischer
Return to Technical Articles LIST Page
Return to HomePage